Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NUNEZ v. FISHER et al
as 5:2021cv02343
Defendant:
DERRICK FISHER, PATRICK BARRETT, JEREMY SCHOENOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 20-1895
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK HAUGHEY, MICHAEL GRANT, SEAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 20-1795
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SWEETS, f/k/a John Doe (Sweets), JACK HAUGHEY, MICHAEL GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
SMITH v CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, et al.
as 7:2020cv00121
Defendant:
BILLY J WHEELER, HUDSON DURDEN, TIM CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ARNELO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29366
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27943
Plaintiff:
BARRETT and DANIEL PATRICK BARRETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON et al v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2019cv05205
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHARPIRO and others
Petitioner:
LEROY A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silver v. Glass, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SILVER
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS R. GLASS, WILLIAM J. AVERY, DENNIS L. SCHOFF and others
BARRETT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66094
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARRETT and MARIAN BARRETT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silver v. Glass et al
as 1:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
David Silver
Defendant:
Dennis R Glass , William J Avery , Dennis L Schoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
