Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Boyd v. Mason et al
as 3:2020cv02403
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Ms. Laura Banta, Denise Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Boyd et al
as 1:2018cv00299
Defendant:
Paul Boyd and Robert Zachary Horack
Plaintiff:
Terrell Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Boyd et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
De'Qua Turner
Defendant:
Paul Boyd, Mario Whitney, Flint Dees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Larson et al
as 1:2016cv01789
Plaintiff:
Paul Boyd
Defendant:
James Larson, Kevin J. Gallager and Mike Rostkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Rider et al
as 1:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
Evan Knox
Defendant:
Bo Rider, Paul Boyd, Joseph Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Heyer v. U.S. Bureau of Prison
as 15-6826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS HEYER and ROBERT PAUL BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, IKE EICHENLAUB, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Boyd v. New York City Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
Paul Boyd
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heyer et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011ct03118
Plaintiff:
Thomas Heyer and Robert Paul Boyd
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane, Ike Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boyd v. Johns
as 5:2010hc02073
Petitioner:
Robert Paul Boyd
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Sikeston Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Don R. Turner
Defendant:
Sikeston Police Department, Chris Rataj, Donner James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
