Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Dieffenbacher v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Paulo Vicente Dieffenbacher
Defendant:
Eric Young, Lori Nicholson, David Bauguess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07631
Plaintiff:
PAUL THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burks v. First Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Deshunski D Burks
Defendant:
First Judicial District Court, Circuit Courts of Appeal, Louisiana State Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ortega v. Thompson
as 2:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Uriel J. Ortega
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. McClure
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Paul Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(HC) Rangel v. Thompson
as 4:2022cv01665
Petitioner:
Jose Rangel
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Troy Kelley v. Paul Thompson, et al
as 22-15711
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL THOMPSON, Warden, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Herlong, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Thompson v. Rosendahl Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01828
Plaintiff:
Paul Thompson
Defendant:
Rosendahl Enterprises, Inc. and Richard Rosendahl
(HC) Stapleton v. Thompson
as 2:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Stapleton
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
