Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 718
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hays v. Platte County et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Defendant: Platte County Sheriff, Jordyn Pearson, Cody Keller and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Hays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff: David Mitchell, II
Defendant: Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Quiero Jr. v. Stohor
as 1:2024cv00579
Defendant: Justin Stohor and Justin Pearson, Justin Parson
Plaintiff: Avon C. Quiero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Whitton et al v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv14097
Plaintiff: Alfred Whitton and Marjorie Whitton
Defendant: Keith Pearson, Cortney Hoyt and Mark Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
HMI - Wills Point, LLC v. Wills Point, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: HMI - Wills Point, LLC
Defendant: Wills Point, Texas and Pam Pearson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?