Cases 1 - 10 of 1,720
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richard v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carl Richard
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith, Wellpath Medical Co., Dr. Muhammad Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Advent Health et al
as 8:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jewel Pearson, III
Defendant:
Advent Health and Gracepoint Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50134
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Amanda Irick, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50130
Plaintiff:
Lamon Weathers, Lil Trave, Paco and others
Defendant:
Kristine Mershon, Ms. A. Scott, Ronald Ostrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Barker
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antonio Yulander Pearson and Tony
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. PATRELLA et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
PATRELLA, TAMARA RUSH, MICHAEL PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20112
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Pearson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
