Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MATTEN v. PECK et al
as 2:2026cv07965
Plaintiff:
Naomi Matten
Defendant:
KRISTIN C. PECK, WETTENY JOSEPH, PAUL M. BISARO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Peck v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02554
Plaintiff:
Reesa Peck
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AUGITTO v. JOSEPH et al
as 2:2026cv07479
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN AUGITTO
Defendant:
WETTENY JOSEPH, PAUL M. BISARO, FRANK A. D'AMELIO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Wolfson v. Peck et al
as 1:2026cv05196
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
Kristin C. Peck, Wetteny Joseph, Paul M. Bisaro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Peck v. Dignity Community Care et al
as 3:2026cv05902
Plaintiff:
Victor Peck
Defendant:
Dignity Community Care and Dignity Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Peck et al
as 1:2026cv04974
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Kristin C. Peck, Wetteny Joseph, Paul M. Bisaro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Peck v. SSA
as 5:2026cv00206
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwayne Peck
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PECK v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2026cv00293
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C PECK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Carnes v. Peck et al
as 2:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terry Dale Carnes
Defendant:
FNU Peck, FNU Costilla and FNU McClanahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peck v. Royal, et al.
as 26-2470
Petitioner:
FRANK M. PECK
Respondent:
TERRY ROYAL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
