Cases 1 - 10 of 52
PennyMac Holdings, LLC v. Yerushalmi et al
as 2:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Yerushalmi, Malka Yerushalmi, Schlissel Ostrow Karabatos PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boothe v. WM specialty Mortgage Specialty LLC et al
as 0:2019cv62685
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Does 1-100, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Boothe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC v. BORDES et al
as 1:2019cv02442
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 4228 RENO ROAD, N.W WASHINGTON, DC 20008 and CHANTEL BORDES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PennyMac Holdings LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv11723
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Seamen's Bank, Donna R Zoppi, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Cesar Morales et al
as 2:2018cv10605
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10, Inclusive and Cesar Morales
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Petitioner:
Hugo Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
STRANSKY v. PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv15929
Defendant:
POWERS KIRN, LLC, PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC and BLANK ROME LLP
Plaintiff:
PETR STRANSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Jose Diaz et al
as 2:2018cv05145
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Jose Diaz, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Jose Diaz
as 2:2018cv00051
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, DOES, Jose Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12174
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
