Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Perry v. Alexander et al
as 2:2015cv02696
Defendant:
Juliet Baird Alexander and Peter Tinkham
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
ALAN J PERRY, NINA E PERRY and LAURA A PERRY
Defendant:
JULIET ALEXANDER and PETER TINKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Perry, et al v. Alexander, et al
as 15-1579
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALAN J. PERRY, NINA E. PERRY and LAURA A. PERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIET ALEXANDER, individually and as Trustee of Jupiter Maine Realty Trust and PETER TINKHAM, individually and as Trustee of Jupiter Maine Realty Trust and as Trustee of Samantha Louise Tinkham Irrevocable Special Needs Trust
PERRY et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2014cv00445
Plaintiff:
ALAN J PERRY , NINA E PERRY and LAURA A PERRY
Defendant:
JULIET ALEXANDER and PETER TINKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. In Re: Order of Return Peter Tinkham
as 1:2014mc00067
Defendant:
In Re: Order of Return Peter Tinkham
Tinkham et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2012cv11610
Plaintiff:
Peter Tinkham and Juliet Alexander
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TINKHAM et al v. PERRY et al
as 1:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
PETER TINKHAM and JULIET B ALEXANDER
Defendant:
LAURA PERRY , ALAN PERRY , NINA PERRY and others
Counter_claimant:
LAURA PERRY and NINA PERRY
Counter_defendant:
JULIET B ALEXANDER and PETER TINKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinkham et al v. Perry et al
as 1:2012cv10893
Plaintiff:
Peter Tinkham and Juliet B. Alexander
Defendant:
Laura Perry, Alan Perry, Nina Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. City of Woodstock, Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
Antwawne Kelly
Defendant:
City of Woodstock, Georgia, William M. Goggans, Mark C. Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
