Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 82
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03834
Petitioner: PHILLIP JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03807
Petitioner: PHILLIP JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08985
Plaintiff: Phillip Jones
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debartoli et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05429
Plaintiff: Rafaella Debartoli , Hope Friedman , Ola Goyer and others
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Jones v. Mr. Figueroa, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00181
Phillip Jones v. Figeroua We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv02494
Taylor v. Thomas-Moore et al
as 2:2015cv02719
Petitioner: Shirearl Taylor
Respondent: Betty Thomas-Moore, Lonnie Thompson, Bill Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv01677
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: PHILLIP JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Imam v. Aneshansel et al
as 2:2015cv02604
Plaintiff: Missionary Imam
Defendant: Rick Aneshansel, Sheldon Miller, J. Phillip Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Duane Jones
as 14-3084
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Duane Phillip Jones, also known as Chicken Jones

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?