Cases 1 - 10 of 9,541
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
YUN v. MINTON et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
ALEX YUN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MINTON, PHILLIPS, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
