Cases 51 - 60 of 855
Lisa Cypress v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 23-1318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA RENIA CYPRESS
Defendant / Appellee:
PNC BANK, N.A. and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Pharmadvice, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Pharmadvice, Inc., Matthew Tolba and Tamer S. Youssef
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
M&T BANK v. HAN et al
as 2:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
KYUNG WHA HAN, PNC BANK, N.A., CITI BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.
as 23-1639
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
PNC BANK N.A.
McLucas v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv00726
Defendant:
Virginia McLucas and PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pabian v. PNC Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Andrzej Pabian
Defendant:
PNC Bank N.A., National City Bank and MidAmerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
M&T BANK v. KYUNG WHA HAN AND SANG TAEK HAN et al
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
KYUNG WHA HAN AND SANG TAEK HAN, PNC BANK N.A., CITIBANK N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robert Gleason v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert Gleason
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A., Melvin Neeley, Jessica Casto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
