Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Dennis Speerly, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Wells et al v. Ponder et al (TV2)
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Azia Wells and James Wells, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Ponder and Dale Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Ponder v. Hans-Peter Wild
as 23-5620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER
Defendant / Appellee:
HANS-PETER WILD
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder v. Emergent Technologies Group, LLC
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Aron D. Ponder
Defendant:
Emergent Technologies Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CollisionRight, LLC v. KY Collision Center, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
CollisionRight, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Kentucky Collision Center
Defendant:
KY Collision Center, LLC and David Austin Ponder
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Senior Trooper John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
