Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13079
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Button v. Doherty
as 26-2370
Plaintiff:
DUSTY BUTTON, - and MITCHELL TAYLOR BUTTON
Defendant:
JULIET DOHERTY, KRISTA KING-DOHERTY and LUIS PONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dickinson v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv02978
Plaintiff:
Alton Dickinson
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation and Jose Guerrero Pons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Adamas Energy L L C v. Sligo Hills L L C et al
as 5:2026cv02243
Defendant:
JOHN B SKANNAL, JOSEPH R GILSOUL, NAN PONS FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
Adamas Energy L L C, Aethon B R L P and P E O Haynesville Holdco L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01746
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pons, et al. v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, LLC, et al.
as 26-2994
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PONS, CAROLINE COLEMAN, CHARLES BELLAVIA and others
Defendant:
WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, LLC, doing business as Kidde Safety Equipment and BRK, LLC, doing business as First Alert
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Lynne Corry and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
