Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Neuens v. US Postmaster Louis DeJoy
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Chris Neuens
Defendant:
US Postmaster Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wesseler v. Louis DeJoy
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mark Wesseler and Mark B Wesseler
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Mendoza v. DeJoy
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY POSTMASTER GENERAL and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WATSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2021cv19102
Plaintiff:
KIM WATSON
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Durden v. Postmaster General of the United States et al
as 3:2021cv01890
Plaintiff:
Denea Durden
Defendant:
Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Jackson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2021cv10966
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cincinnati v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv05231
Plaintiff:
Robert Cincinnati
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Brennan
as 8:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Young
Defendant:
Postmaster General Megan J. Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wayne Holmes v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 18-2488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE A. HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and MICHELLE POLK-GILES
Pena v. PostMaster General et al.,
as 3:2018cv03931
Plaintiff:
Israel Pena
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, PostMaster General and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
