Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nissen v. POTUS
as 1:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
POTUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
The Reckstin Family Trust, Dennis Martinez, Christie Sweeney and others
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Siebel, David Barter and others
Petitioner:
Yining Cai, Leonard Janos, Fadi Karnaby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Sandra Hale v. USA, et al
as 19-20164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA G. HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DEBAKEY MEDICAL CENTER (VA HOSPITAL), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RAJANI POTU, Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST v. POTUS et al
as 1:2017cv12280
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST
Defendant:
POTUS, SCOTUS, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
