Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Casa De Maryland, Inc. v. Chad Wolf
as 20-2263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANGEA LEGAL SERVICES, CASA DE MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, on behalf of itself and its members, ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT, INC., on behalf of itself and its members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as the purported Acting Secretary of Homeland Security
Casa De Maryland, Inc. v. Chad Wolf
as 20-2217
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as the purported Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
OASIS LEGAL SERVICES, PANGEA LEGAL SERVICES and CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT, CASA DE MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, on behalf of itself and its members and ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT, INC., on behalf of itself and its members
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv05208
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Immigration Center for Women and Children, Dolores Street Community Services, Immigrant Legal Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Casa De Maryland, Inc. et al v. Wolf et al
as 8:2020cv02118
Plaintiff:
Oasis Legal Services, Pangea Legal Services, Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Chad F. Wolf
Amicus Curiae:
KIND (Kids In Need of Defense), Morton Rosenberg, Oxfam America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Pangea Legal Services v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 3:2020cv03619
Plaintiff:
Pangea Legal Services
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv01343
Plaintiff:
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, Central American Resource Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at the University of California Hastings College of the Law and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
