Cases 1 - 10 of 17
KILLORAN SHAW v. PARAMOUNT STAFFING, INC et al
as 3:2024cv01134
Defendant:
PARAMOUNT STAFFING, INC, NULOOM, Proman Staffing and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GRACE KILLORAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Paramount Staffing, LLC v. Paramount Staffing Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Paramount Staffing, LLC
Defendant:
Paramount Staffing Solutions LLC, Paramount Staffing Inc., Paramount Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Payne v. Paramount Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06110
Plaintiff:
Shameka Payne
Defendant:
Paramount Staffing, Inc. and Solo Cup Operating Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez et al v. Paramount Staffing of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04163
Plaintiff:
Rosa Ramirez and Maria Rivas
Defendant:
Paramount Staffing of Chicago, Inc., Paramount Staffing of North Chicago, Inc., Paramount Staffing of Memphis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Steven Green v. Paramount Staffing
as 10-5621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN B. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PARAMOUNT STAFFING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
