Cases 1 - 10 of 545
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Donald Parsons v. USA, et al
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Quiero Jr. v. Stohor
as 1:2024cv00579
Defendant:
Justin Stohor and Justin Pearson, Justin Parson
Plaintiff:
Avon C. Quiero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephanie Smith, et al v. Ronald Tyler, et al
as 24-5296
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE LOGSDON SMITH, et al. and BRIDGETT PARSON
Defendant:
RONALD R. TYLER, et al. and JONATHAN G. HALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
