Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Donald Welch, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 15-16598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WELCH, ANTHONY DUK and AARON BITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, DENISE BROWN, Case Manager, Director of Consumer Affairs, in her official capacity, HARRY DOUGLAS and others
Amicus Curiae:
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Donald Welch, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-15023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WELCH, ANTHONY DUK and AARON BITZER
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, ANNA M. CABALLERO, Secretary of California State and Consumer Services Agency, in her official capacity, DENISE BROWN, Case Manager, Director of Consumer Affairs, in her official capacity and others
Welch, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02484
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Anna M. Caballero, Denise Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Welch , Anthony Duk and Aaron Bitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Welch, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012at01319
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Anna M. Caballero, Denise Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Welch , Anthony Duk and Aaron Bitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02089
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al v. Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and CHK Utica, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. , Schmuck Farms, LLC , Mark S. Addis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
