Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Campos et al v. Oil States Energy Services, L.L.C.
as 6:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Campos , Rodrigo Garza, II , Odell Godfrey and others
Defendant:
Oil States Energy Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Mayes v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv03500
Plaintiff:
Dennis Levece Mayes
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center, Patrick Johnson, Connie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ray Reed
Defendant:
Patrick Johnson , Zakiya Fields , City of Shelby, MS Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eddie Brown, III v. Jay Russell, et al
as 14-30479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE BROWN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY RUSSELL, JAHJI BROWN, MARK HOLMES and others
Shuler et al v. Invista S.A.R.L.
as 6:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Larry Shuler , Jennifer Shuler , Michael Wright and others
Defendant:
Invista S.A.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Shelby Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cordaryl Collins
Defendant:
Shelby Police Department, Patrick Johnson, Calvin Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Shelby Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Roderick Campbell
Defendant:
Shelby Police Department and Patrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Shelby, Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Justin Davis
Defendant:
City of Shelby, Mississippi , Patrick Johnson , Kelvin Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2013cv00066
Petitioner:
Ryan Patrick Johnson
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. City of Shelby, Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Earl Walker
Defendant:
City of Shelby, Mississippi , Patrick Johnson and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
