Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 788
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16784
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Randolph v. United States Postal Service, Postmaster General et al
as 2:2016cv12826
Defendant: United States Postal Service, Postmaster General, Tammi Sue Carson, Patrick R. Donahoe and others
Plaintiff: Melvin Randolph
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01600
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Inge Goodson v. Megan J. Brennan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant: INGE GOODSON
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK R. DONAHOE, In his official capacity As Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Ueon Bak v. Patrick R Donahoe
as 8:2015cv01931
Kinsey Hall v. Patrick Donahoe
as 15-41405
Plaintiff - Appellant: KINSEY R. HALL
Defendant - Appellee: POSTMASTER PATRICK R. DONAHOE, United States Postal Service, Southwest Area
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04629
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
ATTKISSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01437
Plaintiff: SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PATRICK R. DONAHOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?