Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walker v. White
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Paul E White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schwarzer v. Squyres
as 22-40256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Schwarzer
Defendant / Appellee:
Clerk of Court Reba D. Squyres, Paul E. White, Robert K. Inselmann and others
Schwarzer v. Squyres et al
as 9:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwarzer
Defendant:
Clerk of Court Reba D Squyres, Paul E White, Robert K Inselmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwarzer v. Squyres et al
as 6:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwarzer
Defendant:
Clerk of Court Reba D Squyres, Paul E White, Robert K Inselmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
White et al v. Unifirst Corporation
as 1:2014cv12192
Plaintiff:
Paul E. White, Jr. and Suzanne White
Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 9:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Paul White, et al
as 12-40641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL E WHITE, ESTATE OF JOHN ROSS KAY, STATE BAR OF TEXAS and others
Johnson v. White et al
as 9:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Paul E White, Estate of John Ross Kay, State Bar Of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
