Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Judith Henry v. Essex County, et al
as 23-1987
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUDITH HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, DETECTIVE DIANE MUNOZ, In her individual and official capacity, SHERIFF JOSEPH DENEQUOLO, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DETECTIVE LEONARD JACKSON, in his individual and official capacity, OFFICER EULETIA LYNN, in her undividual and official capacity, INVESTIGATOR GARY DUNCAN and others
Appellee:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC
Alvarez v. Lynch et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
Town of Burrillville and Stephen J Lynch
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alvarez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Alvarez v. Hughes et al
as 3:2007cv00798
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alvarez and Pedro Alvarez
Defendant:
Nathanael Hughes, Kyle Pearcy and City of Boardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Hughes et al
as 2:2007cv00798
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alvarez and Pedro Alvarez
Defendant:
Nathanael Hughes, Kyle Pearcy and City of Boardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allis et al v. Granholm et al
as 1:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Allis, James E. Allis, Tracy L. Allis and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Marianne Udow, Laura Champagne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
