Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tan v. Zen Partners Construction Corp et al
as 8:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Yeat Peng Tan, JD Construction and Property Management, Corp and ZEN Partners Construction Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Yang v. USA
as 5:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Peng Yang
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Penge v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda L Penge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv00715
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Peng Lin, Kevin Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bentudou E-Commerce Corporation et al v. Peng
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bentudou E-Commerce Corporation , Super-U International, Inc. , Costgo LLC and others
Defendant:
Bin Peng
Counter_claimant:
Bin Peng
Counter_defendant:
Bentudou E-Commerce Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Microsoft Corporation v. Yong et al
as 1:2012cv01004
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Peng Yong, Changzhou Bei Te Kang Mu Software Technology Co., Ltd. and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Peng Ye v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-1738
Petitioner:
PENG FEI YE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
