Cases 1 - 10 of 731
Cypress v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Penny Cypress
Defendant:
James A. Evans and Virginia Housing Loan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio et al. v. Penny et al.
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio, Jess Peacock, Megan Carver and others
Defendant:
Aimenn D. Penny, Chris Uthe, Brandon Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Peterson v. Tillis et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Penny Peterson
Defendant:
Thom Tillis and Ted Budd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Sullivan v. Prop and Rotor Management LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Chloe Sullivan
Defendant:
Prop and Rotor Management LLC, Penny P Properties LLC d/b/a NWIRENTAL.COM, Gary Fund 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
