Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Victoria Dillihunt et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
United States of America, Matthew Abram Groening, Society of Jesus Jesuit Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jemison v. Illinois Department of Health and Family Services et al
as 4:2021cv02099
Defendant:
Contemporary Services Corporation, Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Plaintiff:
George Jemison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. PepsiCo et al
as 1:2020cv20815
Defendant:
Dr. Jadiyer Olga Acosta, Officer Haugen, Pepsi Co and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales v. Pepsi Co Inc.
as 19-1454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Andres Morales
Defendant / Appellee:
Bottling Group, LLC
Defendant:
Pepsi Co Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VANMATRE v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv00270
Defendant:
PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, PEPSI CO., INC., TARGET CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA VANMATRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
