Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BECK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22006
Plaintiff:
PETER LLOYD BECK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Peter Coley
as 21-6792
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER LLOYD COLEY, a/k/a Fred Coley, a/k/a Fred, a/k/a Fredyo, a/k/a Kenny Randell, a/k/a Mipindazi Maku Ujimi, a/k/a Will Johnson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Coley v. United States of America
as 7:2020cv00337
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Peter Lloyd Coley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lloyd et al v. Sjoblom et al
as 3:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Peter Lloyd and Ventor Progress AB
Defendant:
Mikael Sjoblom and Euro Office Americas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Thomas v. Richland County
as 11-6769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER L. THOMAS, a/k/a Peter Lloyd Thomas, a/k/a Patrick R. Harrison
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHLAND COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, JAMES HUNTER MAY and J. CLARKE NEWTON
Peter Thomas v. Richland County Clerk of Court
as 11-6770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER L. THOMAS, a/k/a Peter Lloyd Thomas, a/k/a Patrick R. Harrison
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE, JEANETTE W. MCBRIDE, Clerk of Court, ANNE G. KELLY, Chief Deputy Clerk of Court and others
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
Coley v. Bragg
as 3:2010cv00439
Respondent:
Warden M. Travis Bragg
Petitioner:
Peter Lloyd Coley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company v. Rego et al
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company and Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
Defendant:
John Edward Rego, Regold, Ltd., Auto Wrench and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
