Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. Boar
as 24-2227
Defendant:
DAN-EUGEN BOAR, Rajko Balazs, Petr Kucera and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Boar
as 24-1169
Defendant:
DAN-EUGEN BOAR, Rajko Balazs, Petr Kucera and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cavaluzzi et al v. County of Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cavaluzzi, Lyndon C. Alleyne, Petr Andreenko and others
Defendant:
County of Sullivan and Nancy Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cavaluzzi et al v. County of Sullivan et al
as 5:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cavaluzzi, Lyndon C. Alleyne, Petr Andreenko and others
Defendant:
County of Sullivan and Nancy Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Moye
as 23-11102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benita Nelson and Paul-Douglas Celestine, also known as Paul Douglas Celestine
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Moye, Felicaia Petre and Bonnie Rivera
In re: Subpoenas for Deposition Testimony of Dr. Bruce Bethancourt and Dr. Petr Ruzicka
as 2:2023mc00038
In Re:
Subpoenas for Deposition Testimony of Dr. Bruce Bethancourt and Dr. Petr Ruzicka
Petitioner:
Banner Health, Bruce Bethancourt and Petr Ruzicka
United States of America v. Boar
as 23-1926
Defendant / Appellant:
DAN-EUGEN BOAR, Rajko Balazs, Petr Kucera and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Boar
as 23-1454
Defendant / Appellant:
DAN-EUGEN BOAR, Rajko Balazs, Petr Kucera and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dan Boar v. USA
as 23-70129
Petitioner:
DAN EUGEN BOAR, AKA Rajko Balazs, AKA Daniel Eugen Boar, AKA Petr Kucera
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
