Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 763
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03669
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-2973
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JENNIFER L. TROUNG and PHAN
The Masyc Group, Inc. v. Jonathan Lam et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Plaintiff: THE MASYC GROUP, INC.
Defendant: Jonathan Lam, Kelley Keyes, Greg Demmelmaier and others
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03820
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner: Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant: Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00881
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phan v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff: Nga Phan
Defendant: NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Phan et al v. Luong et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Daniel Huu Phan and Kieu Trang Phan
Defendant: Andrew Luong and Dang Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?