Cases 1 - 10 of 770
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robert Sanchez v. All Transmission and Clutch et al
as 8:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SANCHEZ
Defendant:
ALL TRANSMISSION & CLUTCH, a Business Entity, ALL TRANSMISSION & CLUTCH, INC., a California Corporation, KONG KIM PHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Chung Phan v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1567
Petitioner:
CHUNG VAN PHAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
PEPIN v. PHAN
as 5:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEPIN
Defendant:
BILLY PHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv04182
Defendant:
Shishi City Bonita Shoe Materials Firm(individual Business), ANH KHOA SHOPSH, Chun will trade shops and others
Plaintiff:
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-2973
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JENNIFER L. TROUNG and PHAN
The Masyc Group, Inc. v. Jonathan Lam et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Plaintiff:
THE MASYC GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
Jonathan Lam, Kelley Keyes, Greg Demmelmaier and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
