Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Yevsin
as 3:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Tatyana Yevsin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Voels v. Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04134
Defendant:
Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Voels
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kozak v. Prevention Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02069
Plaintiff:
Scott Kozak
Defendant:
Prevention Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Shue v. Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02566
Plaintiff:
Youe-Kong Shue
Defendant:
Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc , Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Merck and Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanegas v. Noven Pharmacauticals, Inc.
as 1:2016cv23796
Plaintiff:
Leonel Vanegas
Defendant:
Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Landry v. Medimetriks Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 2:2016cv03536
Plaintiff:
Scott Landry
Defendant:
Medimetriks Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Stoner v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Stoner
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Qualitest Pharmaceuticals Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Orosz vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2015cv08504
Plaintiff:
Margaret Orosz
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCoy v. Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Kimberly McCoy
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt Enterprises, LLC , Life Insurance Company of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Arroyo-Flores v. IPR Pharmaceutical, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01998
Plaintiff:
William Arroyo-Flores
Defendant:
IPR Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
