Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Wright v. Baynes et al
as 3:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
A. Cotten Wright
Defendant:
John A. Baynes, III, John Baynes Company, Inc., JBC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Phelps et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2016cv00871
Plaintiff:
Robert Cunningham, Roger Morales, Russell Phelps and others
Defendant:
Estevan Lopez, Grayson Payne and Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Eric Phelps v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 16-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JON PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Eric Phelps v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 16-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC JON PHELPS
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Gerry Phalp, et al v. Lincare, Inc., et al
as 16-10532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERRY PHALP, MATT PEOPLES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ex Rel. Gerry Phelp and Matt Peoples
Defendant - Appellee:
LINCARE, INC., d.b.a. Diabetic Experts of America and LINCARE HOLDINGS INC.
Phelps v. Monitronics International, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marc Phelps
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phelps v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
Eric Jon Phelps
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marc Phelps v. Precision Auto Protection LLC
as 8:2014cv01377
Plaintiff:
Marc Phelps
Defendant:
Precision Auto Protection LLC
Phelps v 1999 Donzi HIN DNAZ8004H899 in rem et al
as 8:2014cv01898
Plaintiff:
Linda Phelps
Defendant:
1999 Donzi HIN DNAZ8004H899 in rem, Carlos Aldamuy, Cross World Water Sports, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Phelps v. Bosco et al
as 1:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Phelps
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, Margaret C. Drake, New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
