Cases 11 - 20 of 2,389
Antiona Phillips v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Antiona Phillips v. Donald Compton, et al
as 24-1575
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Donald Compton, Rehab Program Manager, ADC, Pierce, Mental Health Advocate Supervisor, ADC, Dexter Payne, Chief Assistant Deputy Director, DOC and others
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Psychiatrist et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Unknown Psychiatrist, Barnes Jewish Psychiatric Care Unit and Barnes Jewish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Colleen Phillips
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv03032
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company
Defendant:
Phillip M. Ternes, Sandra McCoy and Pamela S Ternes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Jones v. Patton et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
