Cases 11 - 20 of 21
DL, et al v. District of Columbia, et al
as 12-7042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DL, Tameka Ford, Parent and Next Friend of D.L., JB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation, Kaya Henderson, Chancellor and Deborah Gist, District of Columbia State Superintendent of Education
PIESTER et al v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2012cv02255
Plaintiff:
DEREK PIESTER and SEMAH ZAVAREH
Defendant:
THOMAS F. HOWARD, JR. and INTER COASTAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NLRB v. Alton H. Piester, LLC
as 12-1115
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ALTON H. PIESTER, LLC
DL, et al v. DC, et al
as 11-7153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DL, Tameka Ford, Parent and Next Friend of D.L., JB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation, Kaya Henderson, Chancellor and Deborah Gist, District of Columbia State Superintendent of Education
PIESTER et al v. HICKEY et al
as 2:2011cv04720
Plaintiff:
DEREK PIESTER and SEMAH ZAVAREH
Defendant:
JOHN M. HICKEY and POTAMKIN HYUNDAI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juan Bradley v. Warren Urbom, et al
as 11-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Warren K. Urbom, David L. Piester, William G. Cambridge and others
Juan Bradley v. Warren Urbom, et al
as 11-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Warren K. Urbom, Laurie Smith Camp, Joseph F. Bataillon and others
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00410
Defendant:
All Federal Court Judges In This State, Joseph Bataillion, William Cambridge and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00358
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bataillon, Richard Kopf, David L. Piester and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NLRB v. Alton H. Piester, LLC
as 09-1255
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ALTON H. PIESTER, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
