Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc. v. Pike Electric, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC and Pike Telecom and Renewables, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Leblanc v. Pike Electric, LLC
as 9:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
Michael Leblanc
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Clark v. Barazxon et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Cherry F Clark
Defendant:
Troy Barazxon, Pike Electric, LLC and Arthur Gallagher Risk Management Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Aldenderfer v. Reese et al
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Mark Aldenderfer
Defendant:
Garrick Reese, Pike Electric LLC, Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Maddox v. Pike Electric, LLC
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Maddox
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC doing business as Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Deras v. Pike Electric, LLC
as 1:2022cv23686
Plaintiff:
Jorge Armando Deras
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
J&G Sales, Inc. v. Pike Electric, LLC
as 4:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
J&G Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Perrone v. Ladner et al
as 3:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Megan Perrone
Defendant:
Pike Electric, LLC and Brant Ladner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv24068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
