Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Farfan v. Roberts et al
as 2:2026cv00523
Plaintiff:
Erik Jovanny Farfan
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkham v. Rivers
as 26-548
Plaintiff:
CANDY L. PINKHAM
Defendant:
BERNARD RIVERS, KEITH DONOHUE, ANDRE FRONTIS and others
Mendenhall v. Reese et al
as 6:2025cv02426
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aiden Mendenhall
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Heidi Steward, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pedregon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11720
Plaintiff:
Fred Pedregon, Katrina Peek, Jennifer Peeler and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hamner v. Ruth et al
as 2:2025cv00513
Plaintiff:
Mitchell C. Hamner
Defendant:
Lonnie Ruth, Dana Bailey and Kendra Pinkham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkham v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv00086
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
Rick Pinkham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Winningham v. Phillips et al
as 4:2024cv00881
Defendant:
Trent Myers, Bill Pinkham, Kim Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinkham, Sr. v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv01416
Petitioner:
Dale Maurice Pinkham, Sr.
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinkham v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65440
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pinkham
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
