Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Shoffner v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv01820
Plaintiff:
Marvin Shoffner
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Dr. Glushakow, CRNP Trutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cothran v. Narvaez et al
as 2:2026cv04069
Plaintiff:
DeAndre JeRod Cothran
Defendant:
Alvin A Narvaez, Mark E Leonard, Bradley Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Pliska, Randy et al
as 3:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Stephanie R. Wille, Wisconsin Department of Children and Families and Randy A. Pliska
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Alan Clark v. Earl Scott, et al
as 20-2566
Defendant / Appellee:
Masonda Wheatly, Earl Scott, Dr., Derek Pliska and others
Defendant:
Eileen Ramey, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alan R. Clark
Clark v. Ramey et al
as 2:2019cv04231
Defendant:
Earl Scott, Paliska, Leland Burton and others
Plaintiff:
Alan R Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04058
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Dittman, John Gerke and others
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pliska, Thaddeus v. Berryhill, Nancy
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Pliska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Defendant:
Christopher Barton, Clackamas County, Timothy Conger and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pliska v. Shawano County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv01293
Plaintiff:
Jacob M Pliska
Defendant:
Shawano County Jail, Dessa Clay, Ken Anoligo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
