Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Meyer v. Plumer et al
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Meyer
Defendant:
Jay Plumer, Keith Yordy and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chad Stites v. David Mahoney, et al
as 14-3107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD ANDREW STITES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAHONEY, MICHAEL PLUMER, Dane County Sheriff Captain and JASMIN YUSUF-SAFAVI, Doctor
Scott v. Watson et al
as 5:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Ray Hobbs, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04210
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03342
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Trustees Of The Plumers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund et al v. M.B. Mechanical Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04798
Plaintiff:
401(k) Savings Plan, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Trade Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Michael Burke and M.B. Mechanical Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BROOKS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2010cv01993
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DOMINIC BROOKS
Defendant:
HARRIS, KEVIN PLUMER, LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Trustees of the Plumers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Lawson Jr
as 1:2010mc23940
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Defendant:
Kenneth Lawson Jr
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
ADAMS et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63739
Plaintiff:
WILMA PEELER and PLUMER PEELER
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
