Cases 1 - 10 of 595
Pool Specialists, Inc. v. Ryobi, Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pool Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryobi, Ltd, Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Holdings (USA), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. Virginia Pool Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Brayden R Ward
Defendant:
Virginia Pool Services Inc., Pool Services of Virginia, LLC and Diane I Vermillion
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
In re: Zefeng Chen
as 24-1319
Petitioner:
In re: ZEFENG CHEN, a/k/a Richard, ZHUOGING LU, NINGBO C.F. ELECTRONIC TECH CO., LTD. and others
Pool Scouts Franchising, LLC v. Stuart Road Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Pool Scouts Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Stuart Road Corporation and Brent Berridge
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831 Defense of Trade Secrets Act (DTSA)
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff:
MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant:
WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
Zollicoffer v. Prince George's County Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Sonya Lancaster Zollicoffer
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Department, The Fraternal Order of Police, Major Art'z Watkins and others
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCP Distributors LLC v. Harrington et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
SCP Distributors LLC
Defendant:
Cascade Custom Pools LLC and Christopher Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
