Cases 1 - 10 of 224
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff:
MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant:
WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. USA
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Michael Lamont Poole
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Poole v. Hurwitz et al
as 6:2023cv06927
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Hugh J Hurwitz, Director J Gordon and Jack J Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
COOPER v. SANYANG et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BERNARD COOPER
Defendant:
LAWANDA SANYANG, LADONNA PRICE, ROBIN WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Darden
as 1:2023cv02770
Petitioner:
William Norris Poole, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole v. Poole et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Leroy Poole
Defendant:
Jennifer Poole, Cameron E. Green and Office of the Williamsburg Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Poole et al
as 7:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Leroy Poole
Defendant:
Jennifer Poole, Cameron E. Green and Office of the Williamsburg Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
