Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Poole et al v. Kosimov et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nathan Poole and Sadie Gaither
Defendant:
Farrukhbek Kosimov, Vamar, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental LT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joiner v. Cunningham (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Jimmy Pool and Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bosarge et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Patrick Charest, Clifford Ellis, Robert George and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, Kay E. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
McCullough v. Mr. Pool, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Eric McCullough
Defendant:
Mr. Pool, Inc. and Ryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McConico v. Cook et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00905
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Amy Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
