Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03955
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prado et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2026cv04222
Plaintiff:
Marcos Antonio Prado and Jessenia Elizabeth Parrales Rodriguez
Defendant:
Johney Jones, Penske Truck Leasing, Skidmore Sales and Distribution Co Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05330
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberto Prado-Rodriguez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-12377
Petitioner:
ROBERTO PRADO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
BRADFIELD v. PRADO et al
as 1:2026cv01428
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN BRADFIELD
Defendant:
RYAN PRADO, SUMPTER, REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04997
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
