Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 22-7377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK REID
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, VA Dept. of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Springer v. Stallard et al
as 7:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Ewing, Davis, Unknown Night Shift Commander and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Gary Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharrott v. Halawa Prison ADA Compliance Team et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Defendant:
John Doe x 10, Halawa Prison ADA Compliance Team, Halawa Prison Medical Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Michael Sharrott
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Mageua et al
as 1:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas
Defendant:
Mageua and North Kern State Prison Medical Administrator and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHRUBB v. JEFFERSON COUNTY PRISONS, WARDEN & DEPUTY WARDEN et al
as 2:2009cv01013
Plaintiff:
JERRY SHRUBB
Defendant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY PRISONS, WARDEN & DEPUTY WARDEN, PENNSYLVANIA PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (P.H.S.), JEFFERSON COUNTY PRISONS MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION/STAFF & PSYCHIATRY/PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DOCTORS & NURSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Munsford et al
as 2:2009cv01414
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Atkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Munsford, High Desert State Prison Medical Administration, N.N.C.C. Medical Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
