Cases 11 - 20 of 49
King v. Alabama Department of Probation and Paroles et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Charles King, III
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Probation and Paroles, Cofton, Ashley Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reynolds et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00965
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds, Nehemiah Scroggins, Gerald Jerry Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Calhoun County Probation Office, Steven Walker, Matthew Wades and others
Plaintiff:
Detrick Elston Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiger v. United States Probation Office (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00613
Defendant:
United States Probation Office
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steiger v. Simmons(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Derrick Cunningham and Marcus Simmons
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 4:2019cv00891
Defendant:
I C E, D O S, U S Probation and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Health, Alabama Department of Corrections, Assistant Commander Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Jonathan Hortan, US Probation, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
