Cases 81 - 90 of 113
SMITH v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00221
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Plaintiff:
PEGGY JO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Diaz v. Professional Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01447
Petitioner:
Margaret J. Diaz
Respondent:
Professional Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
HEAD v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
DONNIE M HEAD
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Black et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc.
as 6:2013cv01596
Plaintiff:
Samuel Black , Melvin Mobley and Vadelyn Mobley
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edwards v. Professional Transportation Inc.
as 1:2013cv06507
Plaintiff:
Nelton Edwards
Defendant:
Professional Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taffe v. Professional Transportation, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
Berisford Taffe
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03014
Plaintiff:
Randall Young
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
