Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Pun v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Diyan Pun
Defendant:
Ferrarai Jones and Royal Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. White (Howard)
as 22-3079
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael White, AKA Mike, Joey Colon, Demetrius Wingo, AKA Poppa and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Howard, AKA JuJu
United States of America v. White (Howard)
as 22-2038
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael White, AKA Mike, Joey Colon, Demetrius Wingo, AKA Poppa and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Howard, AKA JuJu
Pun v. Garland
as 22-6428
Petitioner:
BHARAT KUMAR PUN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CE-1709 Midland Trail Shelbyville KY, LLC et al v. Redstone, LLC
as 1:2022cv22213
Plaintiff:
CE-1709 Midland Trail Shelbyville KY, LLC, Amazonia Consulting Group, LLC, Realty Franchise Services, LLC and others
Defendant:
Redstone, LLC d/b/a American Development Partners, Manny Butera, Shawn Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pun v. Garland
as 22-6222
Petitioner:
BHIMRAJ PUN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
Jinja Johnson and Kyng Pariah
Defendant:
Captain Johnson, Psych Dr. P., DOC, Rikers Island, RMSC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
