Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2026cv01534
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D. SWANN
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, GLINDA CECIL, KATRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grossman v. The Trustees of Purdue University
as 2:2026cv07510
Plaintiff:
Robert Grossman
Defendant:
The Trustees of Purdue University
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
SWANN v. PURDUE et al
as 1:2026cv01254
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
PURDUE, KIDD, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. HANCOCK et al
as 5:2026cv00139
Plaintiff:
MYRON C FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GLENN HANCOCK, E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, SARAH ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdue v. United States of America et al
as 3:2026cv05528
Plaintiff:
Grace Purdue
Defendant:
United States of America, Aramark Services Inc, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Zarrow v. Purdue University et al
as 1:2026cv01421
Plaintiff:
Rosalee V. Zarrow
Defendant:
Purdue University and Graham Holdings Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Creighton BloydIn re: Creighton Bloyd
as 26-2159
Petitioner:
In re: CREIGHTON BLOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PURDUE PHARMA LP and MADELINE C. ARLEO
Draper Woodyard v. Foley Police Department/Correctional Facility, et al
as 26-11316
Plaintiff:
DRAPER FRANK WOODYARD
Defendant:
FOLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT CUSTODIAL AGENT, FOLEY POLICE CHIEF, FOLEY POLICE COMMISSIONER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
