Cases 1 - 10 of 100
FRANKLIN v. HANCOCK et al
as 5:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
MYRON C FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GLENN HANCOCK, E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, SARAH ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdue v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2026cv06210
Plaintiff:
Jacob Purdue
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Ryan Thornell, John Mattos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
SCHROEPFER v. MIDDLESEX BOROUGH et al
as 2:2026cv10095
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCHROEPFER
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX BOROUGH, LIEUTENANT SEAN FLANAGAN, DETECTIVE SCOTT MULFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2026cv01618
Petitioner:
EDWARD L. HOLMES, II
Respondent:
GARDNER and J. PURDUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWANN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF IND. et al
as 1:2026cv01582
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF IND., PURDUE, KIDD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2026cv01534
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D. SWANN
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, GLINDA CECIL, KATRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Grossman v. The Trustees of Purdue University
as 2:2026cv07510
Plaintiff:
Robert Grossman
Defendant:
The Trustees of Purdue University
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bass, Sr. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P et al
as 2:2026cv08328
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bass, Sr.
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., Sacker Family Members and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
