Cases 31 - 40 of 364
Amanda Hill, et al v. Quicken Loans, LLC
as 20-55924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMANDA HILL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
QUICKEN LOANS, LLC, FKA Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
GAYLE HYDE
Uzezi Ajomale v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 20-12952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UZEZI AJOMALE
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Jackson v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 2:2020cv00313
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Jackson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Marion Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 1:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03168
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garcia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Woods v. Quicken Loans Inc
as 5:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc
Plaintiff:
Lacy Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Success Funding et al
as 2:2020cv10944
Defendant:
Success Funding and Alex A. Dadourian
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Quicken Loans Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Uriah Jones and Amber Lacinak-Jones
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc., Ascension Health Co. dba St. Vincent's Medical Center Riverside, Ascension Health Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Dixon and Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
