Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Charles v. Wysocki et al
as 2:2026cv00219
Plaintiff:
Hass Charles
Defendant:
L. Wysocki, P. Samaniego, Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMAZIGO v. ARROYABE QUIROGA et al
as 1:2026cv02480
Plaintiff:
Anjali Amazigo
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Erik Javier Arroyabe Quiroga and Walter Arroyabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quiroga v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv05221
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Sue Quiroga
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Quiroga v. HIDALGO COUNTY
as 7:2026cv00296
Plaintiff:
Rocio Quiroga
Defendant:
Hidalgo County, Texas d/b/a Hidalgo County Head Start Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wise v. Quiroga
as 3:2026cv00584
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hakeam Jabbar Wise
Defendant:
Shelli Quiroga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witmer v. Quirogn
as 3:2026cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shane Witmer and Shane M Witmer
Defendant:
Shelli Quirogn and Shelli Quiroga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Walker v. Jacob Frost, et al
as 26-1882
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. WALKER
Defendant:
JACOB B. FROST, Judge, RHONDA L. LANFORD, Judge, J. ALBERTO QUIROGA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
