Cases 1 - 10 of 49
(PC) Allen v. Black et al
as 2:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
Cedric R. Allen
Defendant:
Black, John Doe and Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Allen v. Calvendra, et al.
as 1:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Cedric Raynard Allen and Cedric R. Allen
Defendant:
L. A. Calvendra, V. Bustos, S. Tumacder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05659
Plaintiff:
Shanell K Duncan
Defendant:
Pierce County, Alvin R Allen, Maria Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dao v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Cuong Huy Dao
Defendant:
Dustin Campbell, Carlos Rios, L. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv05285
Plaintiff:
Shanell K Duncan
Defendant:
Alvin R Allen, Jason Finley, Nouhoum Sidibe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASTWOOD v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DWAYNE EASTWOOD
Defendant:
BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR. and ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delroy Booth v. R. Allen, et al
as 22-12195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELROY T. BOOTH
Defendant / Appellee:
R. ALLEN and J. SMITH, in their individual capacity
Booth v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
Delroy T. Booth
Defendant:
Lieutenant R. Allen and Sergeant J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
A Amonett, David Reed, FNU Mermea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore v. Correctional Officer V. Aguirre et al
as 5:2021cv00550
Defendant:
Correctional Officer V. Aguirre, Correctional Officer Marth Vazquez, R. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
