Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MILLER v. KEENE et al
as 1:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
WALTER CLYDE MILLER
Defendant:
WINSTON A. P. KEENE, SR., BRAIN MABE, R. C. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00368
Plaintiff:
DMG EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC, MCCARTNEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, TCS MATERIALS LLC and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shields v. Smith, et al
as 20-6000
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Department of Corrections, R. C. SMITH, Warden and BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK SHIELDS
Vulcan Materials Company et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2019cv01606
Plaintiff:
DMG Equipment Company LLC, McCartney Construction Company Inc, TCS Materials LLC and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation Inc, BNSF Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Gray v. Smith
as 19-6101
Petitioner / Appellant:
LOFTON AMIER GRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. SMITH, Warden
Ashton v. Smith
as 4:2019cv00229
Respondent:
R C Smith
Petitioner:
Issac Luna Ashton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strange v. Smith
as 5:2019cv00391
Petitioner:
Robert Joe Strange
Respondent:
R C Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amaro v. NM Attorney General, et al
as 19-2064
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and R. C. SMITH, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2019cv00079
Defendant:
FNU Pena, Jane or John 1-10 Doe, German Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W Fawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fawley v. Jablonski et al
as 2:2018cv01139
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, R. C. Smith, State of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Fawley and Benjamin W Fawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
